
Revised: March 4, 2022
Published: March 15, 2022
Abstract: [Plain Text Version]
The 2-to-2 Games Theorem (Khot et al., STOC'17, Dinur et al., STOC'18 [2 papers], Khot et al., FOCS'18) shows that for all constants ε>0, it is NP-hard to distinguish between Unique Games instances with some assignment satisfying at least a (12−ε) fraction of the constraints vs. no assignment satisfying more than an ε fraction of the constraints. We show that the reduction can be transformed in a non-trivial way to give stronger completeness: For at least a (12−ε) fraction of the vertices on one side, all the constraints associated with them in the Unique Games instance can be satisfied.
We use this guarantee to convert known UG-hardness results to NP-hardness. We show:
- Tight inapproximability of the maximum size of independent sets in degree-d graphs within a factor of Ω(dlog2d), for all sufficiently large constants d.
- For all constants ε>0, NP-hardness of approximating the size of the Maximum Acyclic Subgraph within a factor of 23+ε, improving the previous ratio of 1415+ε by (Austrin et al., Theory of Computing, 2015).
- For all constants ε>0 and for any predicate P−1(1)⊆[q]k supporting a balanced pairwise independent distribution, given a P-CSP instance with value at least 12−ε, it is NP-hard to satisfy more than a |P−1(1)|qk+ε fraction of constraints.
----------------
A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the Proceedings of the 34th Computational Complexity Conference (CCC'19).